FN20.   Logiodice v. Trs. of Me. Cent. Inst., 296 F.3d 22, 26 (1st Cir. 2002).  Other jurisdictions employ similar formulations of the “state action” test.  See, e.g., Nemser, 807 A.2d at 1291-93 (finding no agency relationship between campus and local police because there was no “inducement” or “agreement” that campus police conduct drug searches on behalf of local police); People v. Boettner, 362 N.Y.S.2d 365, 368-69 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1974), affirmed, 376 N.Y.S.2d 50 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975) (finding no agency relationship where state police “neither expressly nor impliedly requested” that campus police conduct a search of defendants’ rooms, and where there was no “close and continuing relationship” between campus police and local/state law enforcement).