home

New Cases and Developments

NACUA's Legal Resources staff summarizes current higher education cases and developments and provides the full text of selected cases to members. New cases and developments are archived here for up to 12 months.  Cases provided by Fastcase, Inc.

Selected Topics: Tax
Dates
New Search
Tax

University of Utah v. United States (D. Utah September 20, 2017)

Memorandum Decision and Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff sued the United States for a refund of Federal Income Contributions Act (FICA) taxes, arguing that medical residents were exempt from FICA taxation.  The Internal Revenue Code allows states to opt into FICA taxation through §218 Agreements, and also allows states to exclude certain classifications of statutorily-defined employees from FICA taxation through these agreements. In 1999, the University of Utah modified its §218 Agreement to exclude “service performed in the employ of a school, college, or university if such service is performed by a student who is enrolled and regularly attends classes . . . . “ The University interpreted this modification to exclude medical residents.  Relying in-part on the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) long-standing position of excluding medical residents from the statutory definition of “students,” the court concluded that medical residents were not students under the University’s §218 Agreement. 

9/25/2017
read
Tax

Comments to the Senate Finance Committee on Tax Reform and Higher Education (July 17, 2017)

Comments submitted by the American Council on Education (ACE) on behalf of itself and nineteen other higher education associations to the Senate Finance Committee on federal tax provisions affecting institutions of higher education. The comments describe how existing tax provisions help lower- and middle-income students pay for a higher education, encourage charitable giving to institutions, and make tax exempt financing available to institutions. They also explain how these provisions may be improved through tax reform measures. 

7/24/2017
read
Tax

Letter from Higher Education Associations on Maintaining and Strengthening Employer-Provided Education Assistance (Feb. 7, 2017)

Letter to leaders of the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Committee on Finance from the Coalition to Preserve Employer-Provided Education Assistance—a group of higher education and labor groups—regarding Internal Revenue Code Section 127. Section 127 allows employers to offer up to $5,250 annually in tax-free tuition assistance to employees for both undergraduate and graduate study. The letter notes that both House and Senate tax bills in the last session of Congress included provisions increasing the $5,250 limit and expanding eligible uses of the tax benefit, and encourages these congressional committee leaders to continue these efforts in any upcoming tax legislation package.

2/24/2017
read
Tax; Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment; Faculty & Staff

Unemployment Insurance Program Letter on the Interpretation of “Contract” and “Reasonable Assurance” (Dec. 22, 2016)

Letter issued by the U.S. Department of Labor on the interpretation of the terms “contract” and “reasonable assurance” in the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA). This letter outlines the criteria that state agencies should use when determining whether an individual has a contract or reasonable assurance to work at an educational institution in order to determine eligibility for unemployment compensation during periods when school is not in session. This matter is especially relevant to adjunct faculty members, who often receive contracts or offers to teach on a contingent basis.

1/10/2017
read
Tax

Announcement by the Internal Revenue Service on Reporting Amounts Paid for Qualified Tuition Expenses

Announcement 2016-42 released by the Internal Revenue Service regarding requirements for colleges and universities to report amounts paid for qualified tuition and expenses. The Announcement states that the IRS is extending the relief period for institutions reporting the aggregate amounts billed for qualified tuition and related expenses, instead of the aggregate amount of payments received, through the 2017 calendar year. Institutions would otherwise be required to report the latter amount under a change imposed by the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015.

11/18/2016
read
Tax

Update: Announcement on Limited Penalty Relief for Filers of Form 1098-T

Announcement 2016-17 by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) indicating that the IRS will not impose penalties on institutions for reporting the aggregate amount billed for qualified tuition and related expenses (Box 2) on 2016 Form 1098-T instead of the aggregate amount of payments received (Box 1). Section 212 of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act (PATH Act) of 2015 eliminated the option for eligible educational institutions to report aggregate qualified tuition and related expenses billed for the calendar year. The announcement states that the penalties that would normally apply for failure to file correct information will not apply to institutions that reported the aggregate amount billed rather than the aggregate amount of payments received if it is shown that the failure is due to reasonable cause as opposed to willful neglect.
5/3/2016
read
Tax

Letter from Higher Education Associations Urging the Internal Revenue Service to Delay Changes in Reporting Requirements

Letter sent to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) by fifteen higher education associations urging it to delay the implementation of changes to reporting requirements for IRS Form 1098-T. The changes are designed to allow institutions to report how much students paid rather than how much they were billed. The letter states that the vast majority of institutions represented by the signing associations do not have the ability to modify their software systems to meet the new reporting requirements within the time period specified. While the associations express strong support for the IRS's efforts to make it easier for students to claim education benefits and to ensure reporting accuracy, they contend that a rush to implement new reporting requirements "will be counterproductive to achieving these shared goals." 
3/14/2016
read
Tax

Letter to the Internal Revenue Service on Changes to Form 1098-T Reporting

Letter from the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding changes to IRS Form 1098-T reporting. On December 18, 2015, the Consolidated Appropriations Act amended the Internal Code to remove the option for colleges and universities to report amounts billed for qualified tuition and expenses. Due to the complexities involved in transitioning to the new methodology, NACUBO is requesting a delay in the implementation of changes to the reporting requirements. NACUBO also urges the IRS to develop guidance for filing institutions that accommodates the realities of tax year reporting of information that is tied to academic periods, and to publish web-based resources to assist taxpayers with the transition.
3/7/2016
read
12